IAS 8 Basis of Preparation of Financial Statements
International Accounting Standard 8 (IAS 8) prescribes the criteria for selecting and changing accounting policies, together with the accounting treatment and disclosure of changes in accounting policies, changes in accounting estimates, and corrections of errors. The standard aims to enhance the relevance and reliability of an entity's financial statements and their comparability over time and with other entities.
Key Principles:
- Accounting Policies: These are the specific principles, bases, conventions, rules, and practices applied by an entity in preparing financial statements. Policies must be applied consistently. A change is permitted only if required by an IFRS or if it results in reliable and more relevant information. Changes are generally applied retrospectively (adjusting opening equity and comparative figures).
- Accounting Estimates: These involve judgements based on the latest reliable information (e.g., bad debts, useful lives). Changes in estimates are applied prospectively (recognised in profit or loss in the current and future periods affected).
- Errors: Material prior period errors (omissions or misstatements) must be corrected retrospectively in the first set of financial statements authorised for issue after their discovery, by restating comparative amounts.
- Hierarchy of Selection: In the absence of a specific IFRS, management uses judgement to develop a policy that provides relevant and reliable information, considering other IFRSs dealing with similar issues and the Conceptual Framework.
|
Para |
Topic |
Detailed Summary |
|
1 |
Objective |
The objective is to enhance the relevance, reliability, and comparability of financial statements by prescribing the basis of preparation, including criteria for selecting and changing accounting policies and the treatment of estimates and errors. |
|
3 |
Scope |
This standard applies to selecting and applying accounting policies and accounting for changes in policies, changes in estimates, and corrections of prior period errors. |
|
5 |
Definitions |
Key terms are defined: Accounting policies are specific principles and practices applied in preparing statements. Accounting estimates are monetary amounts subject to measurement uncertainty. Prior period errors are omissions/misstatements arising from failure to use reliable information available at the time. Retrospective application involves applying a new policy as if it had always been applied. Prospective application involves recognising effects in current and future periods. |
|
6A |
Fair Presentation |
Financial statements shall present fairly the financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. This requires faithful representation of transactions in accordance with the Conceptual Framework. Compliance with IFRSs is presumed to result in fair presentation. |
|
6B |
Statement of Compliance |
An entity whose financial statements comply with IFRS Accounting Standards shall make an explicit and unreserved statement of such compliance in the notes. |
|
6E |
Departure from IFRS |
In extremely rare circumstances where compliance with an IFRS would be so misleading as to conflict with the objective of financial statements, an entity shall depart from that requirement if the regulatory framework permits, disclosing the nature, reason, and financial effect of the departure. |
|
6K |
Going Concern |
Management shall assess the entity's ability to continue as a going concern. Financial statements are prepared on a going concern basis unless management intends to liquidate or cease trading. Material uncertainties regarding going concern must be disclosed. |
|
6M |
Accrual Basis |
An entity prepares its financial statements, except for cash flow information, using the accrual basis of accounting. |
|
7 |
Selection of Policies |
When an IFRS specifically applies to a transaction, the accounting policy is determined by applying that IFRS. |
|
8 |
Immateriality |
Policies need not be applied when the effect is immaterial. However, it is inappropriate to make immaterial departures to achieve a particular presentation. |
|
10 |
Absence of Specific IFRS |
In the absence of a specific IFRS, management uses judgement to develop a policy that results in information that is relevant to decision-making needs and reliable (faithful, neutral, prudent, and complete). |
|
11 |
Hierarchy of Guidance |
In making judgements, management refers to sources in descending order: (a) requirements in IFRSs dealing with similar issues; and (b) definitions and concepts in the Conceptual Framework. |
|
12 |
Other Sources |
Management may also consider recent pronouncements of other standard-setting bodies using a similar conceptual framework, other accounting literature, and industry practices, provided they do not conflict with IFRS sources. |
|
13 |
Consistency |
An entity shall select and apply accounting policies consistently for similar transactions, unless an IFRS requires or permits categorisation of items for which different policies may be appropriate. |
|
14 |
Changes in Policy |
An entity shall change an accounting policy only if the change is required by an IFRS or results in the financial statements providing reliable and more relevant information. |
|
16 |
Not Changes in Policy |
The application of a policy to transactions that differ in substance from previous ones, or to new transactions that did not occur previously, are not changes in accounting policies. |
|
17 |
Revaluation |
The initial application of a policy to revalue assets under IAS 16 or IAS 38 is a change in policy dealt with as a revaluation under those standards, not IAS 8. |
|
19 |
Applying Policy Changes |
A change resulting from the initial application of an IFRS is accounted for in accordance with specific transitional provisions. If none exist, or for voluntary changes, the change is applied retrospectively. |
|
22 |
Retrospective Application |
When applied retrospectively, the entity adjusts the opening balance of each affected component of equity for the earliest prior period presented and other comparative amounts as if the new policy had always been applied. |
|
23 |
Limitations on Retrospective |
Retrospective application is required unless it is impracticable to determine the period-specific or cumulative effects of the change. |
|
24 |
Impracticable Period-Specific |
If determining period-specific effects is impracticable, the new policy is applied to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities at the beginning of the earliest period for which retrospective application is practicable. |
|
25 |
Impracticable Cumulative |
If determining the cumulative effect is impracticable, the entity adjusts comparative information to apply the new policy prospectively from the earliest date practicable. |
|
27 |
Impracticability Defined |
If an entity cannot determine the cumulative effect for all prior periods, it applies the new policy prospectively from the earliest practicable date, disregarding prior cumulative adjustments. |
|
27A |
Disclosure of Policies |
An entity shall disclose material accounting policy information. Information is material if it can reasonably be expected to influence decisions of primary users. |
|
27C |
Materiality Judgement |
Policy information is likely material if it relates to material transactions and involves a change in policy, a choice between options, absence of a specific IFRS, significant judgements, or complex accounting. |
|
27G |
Disclosure of Judgements |
An entity shall disclose the judgements (apart from estimations) that management has made in applying accounting policies which have the most significant effect on recognised amounts. |
|
28 |
Disclosure: New IFRS |
When initial application of an IFRS has an effect, the entity discloses the title, nature of change, transitional provisions, and the amount of the adjustment for each line item and earnings per share for current and prior periods presented. |
|
29 |
Disclosure: Voluntary Change |
For voluntary changes, the entity discloses the nature of the change, reasons why it provides reliable and more relevant information, and the amount of the adjustment for line items and earnings per share. |
|
30 |
Issued but Not Effective |
When an entity has not applied a new IFRS that is issued but not yet effective, it must disclose this fact and known or reasonably estimable information relevant to assessing the possible impact of application. |
|
31A |
Estimation Uncertainty |
An entity shall disclose information about assumptions and major sources of estimation uncertainty at the end of the reporting period that have a significant risk of resulting in a material adjustment to carrying amounts within the next financial year. |
|
32 |
Accounting Estimates |
Accounting estimates involve measurement uncertainty where items cannot be observed directly (e.g., loss allowances, net realisable value, fair value, depreciation, warranty provisions). |
|
34 |
Changes in Estimates |
An entity may need to change an estimate due to new information or more experience. This does not relate to prior periods and is not a correction of an error. |
|
36 |
Prospective Application |
The effect of a change in an accounting estimate is recognised prospectively in profit or loss in the period of the change (if it affects that period only) or the period of change and future periods (if it affects both). |
|
39 |
Disclosure of Estimates |
An entity shall disclose the nature and amount of a change in an accounting estimate that has an effect in the current period or is expected to have an effect in future periods. |
|
41 |
Errors |
Errors can arise in recognition, measurement, presentation, or disclosure. Financial statements do not comply with IFRSs if they contain material errors or intentional immaterial errors. |
|
42 |
Retrospective Restatement |
Material prior period errors are corrected retrospectively in the first set of financial statements authorised for issue after discovery by restating comparative amounts or opening balances of the earliest period presented. |
|
43 |
Limitations on Restatement |
A prior period error is corrected by retrospective restatement unless it is impracticable to determine the period-specific or cumulative effects. |
|
44 |
Impracticable Restatement |
If determining period-specific effects is impracticable, the entity restates opening balances for the earliest period practicable. If determining cumulative effects is impracticable, the entity restates comparatives prospectively from the earliest date practicable. |
|
49 |
Disclosure of Errors |
An entity shall disclose the nature of the prior period error, the amount of the correction for each line item and earnings per share for each period presented, and the amount of the correction at the beginning of the earliest prior period presented. |
|
50 |
Impracticability Circumstances |
It is impracticable to apply a change retrospectively or restate for an error if data was not collected in the prior period and cannot be recreated, or if it requires significant estimates where it is impossible to distinguish information available at the time from hindsight. |
|
53 |
No Hindsight |
Hindsight should not be used when applying a new policy to or correcting amounts for a prior period, particularly regarding assumptions about management's intentions or estimates. |
|
54 |
Effective Date |
The standard applies for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2005. Amendments regarding definitions of material and accounting estimates have later effective dates (2020 and 2023 respectively). |
Warning!: Things are only going to heat up as we move forward in the journey. If you spot anything that needs attention or want to share feedback, feel free to reach out at contact@brightxco.com.

Comments