Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance
International Accounting Standard 20 (IAS 20) outlines the accounting treatment and disclosure requirements for government grants and the disclosure of other forms of government assistance.
Key Principles:
- Recognition: Government grants are recognised only when there is reasonable assurance that the entity will comply with the conditions attaching to them and that the grants will be received.
- Measurement: Grants are recognised in profit or loss on a systematic basis over the periods in which the entity recognises as expenses the related costs for which the grants are intended to compensate.
- Presentation (Grants related to assets): These can be presented in the statement of financial position either by setting up the grant as deferred income or by deducting the grant in arriving at the carrying amount of the asset.
- Presentation (Grants related to income): These are presented in the statement of profit or loss, either separately or under a general heading such as 'other income', or they are deducted in reporting the related expense.
- Repayment: A grant that becomes repayable is accounted for as a change in an accounting estimate.
|
Para |
Topic |
Detailed Summary |
|
1 |
Scope |
This standard applies to the accounting for and disclosure of government grants and the disclosure of other forms of government assistance. |
|
2 |
Exclusions |
The standard does not deal with problems arising from changing prices, assistance provided in the form of tax benefits (e.g., tax holidays, investment tax credits), government participation in ownership, or grants covered by IAS 41 Agriculture. |
|
3 |
Definitions |
The following terms are used in this Standard with the meanings specified:
|
|
4 |
Assistance Forms |
Government assistance takes many forms with varying natures and conditions, often intended to encourage entities to take actions they otherwise would not have taken. |
|
5 |
Significance |
Receipt of assistance is significant for financial statements to determine the appropriate method of accounting for transferred resources and to indicate the extent of benefit received, facilitating comparison with prior periods and other entities. |
|
6 |
Terminology |
Grants may be referred to by other names such as subsidies, subventions, or premiums. |
|
7 |
Recognition Criteria |
Government grants, including non-monetary ones at fair value, are not recognised until there is reasonable assurance that the entity will comply with the attached conditions and the grants will be received. |
|
8 |
Receipt vs Compliance |
Receipt of a grant does not by itself provide conclusive evidence that the conditions have been or will be fulfilled. |
|
9 |
Receipt Method |
The accounting method is not affected by whether the grant is received in cash or as a reduction of a liability to the government. |
|
10 |
Forgivable Loans |
A forgivable loan is treated as a government grant when there is reasonable assurance that the entity will meet the terms for forgiveness. |
|
10A |
Below-Market Loans |
The benefit of a government loan at a below-market interest rate is treated as a government grant. The loan is recognised and measured under IFRS 9, and the benefit is measured as the difference between the initial carrying value of the loan and the proceeds received. |
|
11 |
Contingencies |
Once recognised, any related contingent liability or asset is treated in accordance with IAS 37. |
|
12 |
Income Approach |
Grants are recognised in profit or loss on a systematic basis over the periods in which the entity recognises as expenses the related costs the grants are intended to compensate. |
|
13 |
Approaches |
Two broad approaches exist: the capital approach (recognised outside profit or loss) and the income approach (recognised in profit or loss). |
|
14 |
Capital Approach Arguments |
Arguments for the capital approach include that grants are financing devices and should be in the statement of financial position, they do not need repayment, and they are incentives without related costs so should not be in profit or loss. |
|
15 |
Income Approach Arguments |
Arguments for the income approach include that grants are receipts from a source other than shareholders, they are earned through compliance with conditions, and since taxes are expenses, grants (as fiscal policy extensions) should be in profit or loss. |
|
16 |
Systematic Recognition |
It is fundamental to the income approach that grants are recognised in profit or loss on a systematic basis over the periods the related costs are expensed. Recognition on a receipts basis is generally not acceptable unless no allocation basis exists. |
|
17 |
Cost Identification |
Periods for recognising costs related to grants are usually ascertainable. Grants for specific expenses are recognised in the same period as the expense. Grants for depreciable assets are recognised in proportion to depreciation expense. |
|
18 |
Non-Depreciable Assets |
Grants related to non-depreciable assets may require fulfilling obligations and are recognised in profit or loss over the periods that bear the cost of meeting those obligations (e.g., a land grant conditional on erecting a building). |
|
19 |
Package of Aid |
When grants are part of a package with multiple conditions, care is needed to identify conditions giving rise to costs to determine the earning periods. Allocation of the grant on different bases may be appropriate. |
|
20 |
Immediate Support |
A grant receivable as compensation for expenses/losses already incurred or for immediate financial support with no future related costs is recognised in profit or loss in the period it becomes receivable. |
|
21 |
Specific Entities |
Grants awarded for immediate support rather than specific expenditure incentives may be confined to a specific entity. These may warrant recognition in the period the entity qualifies to receive them, with disclosure. |
|
22 |
Past Losses |
Grants receivable for expenses or losses incurred in a previous period are recognised in profit or loss when receivable, with disclosure. |
|
23 |
Non-Monetary Grants |
Grants may involve non-monetary assets like land. These are usually accounted for at fair value, though recording both asset and grant at a nominal amount is an alternative. |
|
24 |
Presentation (Assets) |
Grants related to assets are presented in the statement of financial position either as deferred income or by deducting the grant from the carrying amount of the asset. |
|
25 |
Asset Methods |
Both methods are acceptable. One recognises deferred income amortised over the useful life; the other deducts the grant from the asset, resulting in reduced depreciation expense. |
|
26 |
Cash Flows |
Because asset purchases and related grant receipts cause major cash flow movements, they are often disclosed as separate items in the statement of cash flows regardless of the presentation method used in the balance sheet. |
|
29 |
Presentation (Income) |
Grants related to income are presented in the statement of profit or loss, either separately (or under a general heading like other income) or as a deduction in reporting the related expense. |
|
30 |
Income Methods Arguments |
Supporters of separation argue netting is inappropriate and separation facilitates comparison. Supporters of deduction argue expenses might not have been incurred without the grant, so netting avoids misleading presentation. |
|
31 |
Income Disclosure |
Both presentation methods are acceptable. Disclosure of the grant is necessary for proper understanding, usually involving the effect of the grant on any item of income or expense required to be separately disclosed. |
|
32 |
Repayment |
A repayable grant is accounted for as a change in accounting estimate. Repayment of an income grant is applied against any unamortised deferred credit, with any excess recognised in profit or loss. Repayment of an asset grant increases the carrying amount of the asset or reduces deferred income; cumulative additional depreciation is recognised immediately in profit or loss. |
|
33 |
Impairment on Repayment |
Repayment of an asset grant may require consideration of possible impairment of the new carrying amount of the asset. |
|
34 |
Excluded Assistance |
Certain forms of government assistance that cannot reasonably be valued or distinguished from normal trading are excluded from the definition of grants. |
|
35 |
Examples |
Examples of excluded assistance include free technical advice, guarantees, and government procurement policies responsible for a portion of sales. |
|
36 |
Assistance Disclosure |
The significance of such benefits may require disclosure of the nature, extent, and duration of the assistance to prevent misleading financial statements. |
|
38 |
Infrastructure |
Government assistance does not include the provision of general infrastructure (transport, communication) or improved facilities available to the entire local community. |
|
39 |
Disclosures |
Matters to be disclosed include: (a) the accounting policy and presentation methods adopted; (b) the nature and extent of recognised grants and indication of other assistance; and (c) unfulfilled conditions and contingencies attached to recognised assistance. |
|
40 |
Transition |
An entity adopting the standard for the first time shall comply with disclosure requirements and either adjust financial statements for the policy change under IAS 8 or apply provisions only to grants becoming receivable/repayable after the effective date. |
|
41 |
Effective Date |
The standard becomes operative for financial statements covering periods beginning on or after 1 January 1984. |
Warning!: Things are only going to heat up as we move forward in the journey. If you spot anything that needs attention or want to share feedback, feel free to reach out at contact@brightxco.com.

Comments